December 25th, 2009

I just got home from a day with my family and I was reminded of how other peoples tension can cause a negative emotional response. I had to take 2 Xanax just to deal with my brother’s typical crap.
~Little backstory~
My 16 yr old sister S recently moved in with me due to severe personality conflicts between my mother and S. Things were getting so bad that they could barely be in the same room without exploding. This move has been beneficial to all in my opinion. Our mother seems less stressed, S is much happier, and I have benefited greatly by having to take care of myself so I can take care of someone else. The one person that has taken this hard is our dad; he is really close with S and misses her terribly.
~Back to today~
So, everyone is having a nice time and my brother picks a fight about why I suddenly am showing such an interest in S. Maybe it’s just me but I feel it’s normal to be there for your family when they need you no matter what has happened in the past. I love everyone of them and would do anything within my power for them (even my asshole brother). It never fails that you can have a perfect family get together and that one jerk relative can cap it off on a bad note.
At any rate, other than my brother’s tantrum, the day was really nice. Everyone got what they asked for and I had said I wanted nothing but still got some very nice things. I am actually sitting here typing this in my new Snuggie. lol These things really are warm and comfy. Now that things are starting to get on a more regular schedule with S being here I will be making the effort, that I keep promising, to write daily. As for now, gonna curl up in my snuggie and watch a movie with my little sis, who’s curled up in her snuggie (mom went snuggie crazy this year), and just relax till I doze off for a couple hours. Have to be at the store by 6 to hit after Christmas sales.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Share This Post

Show Love (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
January 4th, 2009

Expectant Brains Help Predict Anxiety Treatment Success
A network of emotion-regulating brain regions implicated in the pathological worry that can grip patients with anxiety disorders may also be useful for predicting the benefits of treatment.
ScienceDaily - Jan. 4, 2009

A new study appearing online Jan. 2 reports that high levels of brain activity in an emotional center called the amygdala reflect patients’ hypersensitivity to anticipation of adverse events. At the same time, high activity in a regulatory region known as the anterior cingulate cortex is associated with a positive clinical response to a common antidepressant medication.

The study will appear in an upcoming issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry.

For individuals with anxiety disorders, the anticipation of a bad outcome can be worse than the outcome itself, says Jack Nitschke, assistant professor and clinical psychologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health and lead author of the new study. Some individuals spend so much time worrying about getting into a negative situation or having a panic attack, he says, that the condition becomes debilitating. “In an extreme situation, they might not even leave their home,” he says.

To study how the brain responds to anticipation, researchers at the UW-Madison Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) as they viewed a set of negative and neutral images. Patients were shown pre-image cues several seconds before each picture so they would know what to expect: a circle before a neutral image and a minus sign before an aversive image.

While GAD patients showed no difference compared to healthy subjects in brain activation in response to the aversive or neutral pictures themselves, they displayed unusually high levels of amygdala activity in response to both anticipatory cues. According to Nitschke, the response suggests that the patients are hypersensitive to the anticipation of any stimuli, even those they are told will not be negative.

“In response to both of those anticipatory signals, the GAD subjects — the anxious folks — are showing huge amounts of amygdala activation that is much more than what healthy control subjects showed,” he says.

The researchers believe the high levels of amygdala activity seen in GAD patients reflects an indiscriminate and disproportionately large response to the idea that something negative might happen in the future, even in a lab setting where they know nothing bad will actually occur, he says.

“It suggests that there are differences in anticipatory brain processing in these individuals,” he says, adding that the result has important implications for other related disorders as well. “That’s the crux of what’s debilitating in people with anxiety disorders, whether it’s panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder.”

The patterns of brain activity also appear to hold predictive power for how patients will respond to treatment for their anxiety. After their brain scans, the GAD patients in the study received an eight-week course of treatment with venlafaxine (Effexor), a common antidepressant. Clinical improvement on the medication was associated with higher levels of pre-treatment brain activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in anticipation of both aversive and neutral stimuli.

The ACC is a regulatory brain region important for modulating emotional responses. Activity in the same area has been shown to predict clinical outcome in patients with depression.

“When you look within the GAD patient population, that area is what predicts whether they respond to this treatment,” says Nitschke. “What it suggests is that people who still have some residual functioning of that area are the people who are more likely to get better” with this drug.

Choosing the most appropriate treatment approach for an individual patient is an important and difficult issue, he says, because anxiety disorders encompass a range of conditions with diverse symptoms and causes. Anxiety disorders are also frequently associated with depression, and Nitschke and his collaborators next plan to examine GAD patients with and without major depressive disorder.

“This is a critical new direction that the field is already moving in — using fMRI to predict treatment response,” he says. “Hopefully we’ll be able to use that eventually to determine what kind of treatment to provide to people.”"

Popularity: 41% [?]

Share This Post

Show Love (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
December 4th, 2008

I had written an article about a book that deals with positive thoughts as way of treating depression and anxiety. This study seems to confirm how strongly I felt about that book. Check out my post on  The Feeling Good Handbook.
Again, never change your course of treatment or discontinue medication without consulting your doctor. If you feel that your provider is not open to listening to other options you discover, seek a second opinion but do not stop meds on your own.

Study Finds Non-drug Meditation Treatment Beats Depression

Tuesday, December 02, 2008 by: Sherry Baker, Health Sciences Editor

(NaturalNews) Clinical depression is far more than feeling blue. According to the National Institutes of Health, more than 20 million people in the U.S. have persistant depression that can interfere with everyday life, impact health and even lead to suicide. Now, for the first time, a study has shown that treatment based on meditation is an effective alternative to prescription drugs, even for people suffering from serious, long-term depression.

The research, just published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, found that the group-based psychological treatment called Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) was as good or better as treatment with anti-depressants like Prozac in preventing a relapse of serious depression — and the non-drug therapy was more effective in enhancing quality of life. What’s more, the study concluded MBCT is cost-effective in helping people with a history of depression stay well for the long term.

The research team, which included British investigators from the Mood Disorders Center at the University of Exeter and the Center for Economics of Mental Health (CEMH) at the Institute of Psychiatry at King’s College in London, looked at 123 people who had suffered repeated episodes of clinical depression. In a randomized control trial , the research subjects were assigned to one of two groups. Half continued their on-going drug treatment with anti-depressants and the rest participated in an MBCT course and were also given the option of stopping their anti-depressant medications.

MBCT focuses on targeting negative thinking and helps people who are at risk for recurring depression to stop their depressed moods from spiraling out of control into a full episode of depression. During the eight-week trial, groups of between eight and fifteen people attended meetings with a therapist who taught them a range of meditation exercises that they could continue to practice on their own once the course ended. The MBCT exercises were primarily based on Buddhist meditation techniques and helped the study participants learn to focus on the present, rather than dwelling on the past or worrying about future tasks.

Although the meditation exercises worked in a different way for each person, many reported more control over their negative thoughts and depressed feelings. Over the 15 months after the trial ended , about 47% of the group following the MBCT course experienced a relapse — but those who continued normal treatment with anti-depressant drugs experienced a much higher, 60 percent relapse rate. In addition, the group practicing the mindfulness meditation techniques learned in the MBCT program reported a far better quality of life, more overall enjoyment and better physical well-being.

In a statement to the media, Professor Willem Kuyken of the University of Exeter , who headed the research, explained that people treated with anti-depressants are highly vulnerable to relapse when they stop their prescription drug therapy. “MBCT takes a different approach – it teaches people skills for life. What we have shown is that when people work at it, these skills for life help keep people well. Our results suggest MBCT may be a viable alternative for some of the 3.5 million people in the UK known to be suffering from this debilitating condition. People who suffer depression have long asked for psychological approaches to help them recover in the long-term and MBCT is a very promising approach. I think we have the basis for offering patients and GPs an alternative to long-term anti-depressant medication. We are planning to conduct a larger trial to put these results to the test and to examine how MBCT works,” Kuvken said.”

Popularity: 47% [?]

Share This Post

Show Love (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
December 3rd, 2008

“Nearly 5 Percent Of U.S. Population Suffers From Persistent Depression Or Anxiety

Science Daily - 12-3-2008

Though effective treatments are available for individuals suffering from chronic depression and anxiety, very little is known about how often these treatments are used or how prevalent these conditions are among the nation’s general population.

But in a first-of-its-kind study, UCLA researchers have developed estimates for both the prevalence of chronic psychiatric illness in the general population and how often individuals suffering from such illnesses receive appropriate treatment.

In the study, published in the December issue of the peer-reviewed journal Psychiatric Services and currently available online, researchers found that approximately 4.7 percent of the nation’s population suffers from persistent depression or anxiety disorders, with a minority of those afflicted receiving adequate medication or counseling.

“From a policy perspective, this study indicates that we have to do much better in terms of helping people in the population and clinicians in primary care,” said lead author Dr. Alexander S. Young, a UCLA professor of psychiatry and director of health services for the Department of Veterans Affairs Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC). “We need to understand that psychiatric disorders are treatable with psychotherapy and/or medication. Patients would benefit if we improved linkages between primary care and specialty mental health care so that patients are referred and accept referrals to mental health specialists, especially when they are chronically ill.

“Also, we have to improve insurance arrangements so that they encourage more intensive treatment in people who remain ill,” he said.

The study was based on data from Healthcare for Communities, a nationally representative household survey of adults in the United States. The researchers analyzed responses from 1,642 adults with major depression or anxiety disorders. These surveys, conducted in 1997 and 1998, with follow-ups approximately two-and-a-half years later, assessed diagnosis, quality of life, treatment satisfaction, medical conditions, suicidal thoughts, insurance, and the use of medications and counseling.

At follow-up, the researchers found that 59 percent of the individuals no longer met the criteria for having a psychiatric disorder. But to their surprise, they found that among those who remained ill, there were only modest increases in medication use and no statistically significant increase in the use of counseling for their disorders — measures that are known to significantly improve outcomes, especially when used in combination. Among this subgroup:

  • 87 percent had a chronic, co-morbid medical disorder.
  • In the prior year, 88 percent had seen a primary care practitioner, but only 22 percent had consulted a mental health specialist.
  • In the two-and-a-half years between baseline and follow-up, use of medication rose from 21 percent to 29 percent, and use of counseling fell from 23 percent to 19 percent.
  • Only 12 percent with persistent illness were getting both medication and counseling (the appropriate treatment in this situation).
  • 51 percent had suicidal thoughts at follow-up.
  • Men and those with less education received less treatment.

“Persistent depressive and anxiety disorders are remarkably common in the U.S. population and are associated with substantial morbidity. There are significant problems with the quality of care received by this population, and these problems persist over time,” the researchers concluded. “In the population with persistent depressive and anxiety disorders, increasing the rate of appropriate care from its current low level could result in substantial improvement in individuals’ lives.”

In addition to Young, study authors included Ruth Klap, Ph.D., of the Health Services Research Center at UCLA; Rebecca Shoai, M.P.H., M.S.W., affiliated with MIRECC; and Kenneth B. Wells, M.D., M.P.H., of the UCLA Department of Psychiatry and the RAND Corp.

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funded the study, with additional support from the National Institute of Mental Health and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.”

Adapted from materials provided by University of California - Los Angeles.


Popularity: 46% [?]

Share This Post

Show Love (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
November 30th, 2008

Finally a study that gets it right, at least from my experience. I feel that any person, be them male or female, emerges from a failed relationship is damaged. At least anyone with a heart. I do agree that men are more reluctant to marry but I feel that has more to do with fear of closing off options than mental status.  We grow up as little girls believing that one day prince charming is going to show up on his white stallion and we’ll ride off into the sunset to our happily ever after. Well girls, there is no happily ever after; there is just life. Life is work, devotion, arguments, bills, and sometimes going to bed angry. Once we accept the reality of what a relationship is we can help to calm the anxiety the men in our lives feel as a result of our unfair expectations. As for men, you have to understand that marriage isn’t just a contract where you sign over your life and soul. It is a celebration of love and commitment. We don’t want to be married, we want to be your wife. We want to love, honor, and (yes I still believe this) obey you. We want you to do the same. It’s not about owning a person; it’s about two people owning each others hearts. (Just a note about The guy I am about to write about we broke up not too long ago but I still feel this relationship is not over, prime example he is asleep in the recliner right next to me. The physical aspect of our relationship has change but everything else has remained the sane) I have lived with D for a year and a half and I don’t love him any less than if he were my husband but I yearn to belong to him in every sense; legally, in the eyes of God, and I would be beyond honored to take his name. He on the other hand feels that living together in the way we do we are married in every sense other than a piece of paper.

“Reference: Partnership and mental health over time. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004:58; 53-8

Cohabiting Better For Men’s Mental Health; Marriage Better For Women’s

Jan 05 2004

Getting back into a relationship after a marriage fails is good for men’s mental health, but bad for women’s, suggest the results of national survey in the U.K. The study also found that cohabiting is better for men’s mental health, but marriage is better for women’s,.

The research is based on responses to a validated mental health questionnaire from 4,430 men and women under the age of 65, part of the annual British Household Panel Survey, which began in 1991. Men whose relationships with a first partner fell apart had much poorer mental health than men who remained with their first partner. And those who decided to live with a new partner after a marriage break-up also had better mental health than men who stayed single or who remarried.

The mental health of women who had not split up from their partners was also better than that of women who did. But women’s mental health progressively deteriorated the more break-ups they experienced and the more times they moved on to other relationships. Women who stayed single actually enjoyed much better mental health, which was not true of men.

While the mental health of both men and women was better in long term relationships. Men who chose to marry their partners fared had poorer mental health than those who chose just to live with them. Women fared better if they married.

The authors conclude that living with a partner is better for mental health, but that women have a harder time emotionally when relationships fail.”

Popularity: 44% [?]

Share This Post

Show Love (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...